Home


Products / English


English

Français Italiano Español Português Català Maltin

Deutsch Nederlands Lëtzebuergesch Gaeilge Scottish Dansk Svenska Norsk Íslensku Suomalainen Eestlane Latvietis Lietuvis

Pусский Беларус українська Polski Česky Slovenský Magyar Română Slovenščina Hrvatski Bosanski Српски Shqiptar български македонски Ελληνικά ქართული Türk हिन्दी

عربى

中国 日本語 한국어



Contents / English

(More than 500 articles about tongkat ali and better physical relationships in general)



Butea superba and a sense of relationships accomplishment


By Serge Kreutz


Butea Superba Research, 2019


Feeling great from great relationships is different from feeling great from drugs.

Sure, drugs can make you feel good, somehow. But I am not even convinced that this is true.

Certainly, if you are addicted to nicotine, smoking cigarettes makes you feel better. And if you are addicted to heroin, it's the same.

I don't smoke. I did as a boy, but stopped it when I decided that good relationships is the only thing I care for.

I am sure that good relationships feels good. I am not sure whether marijuana, LSD, smoked opiates, amphetamines, and cocaine actually do.

Sure, these substances all make me feel something. Amphetamines and cocaine make me feel excited in a positive mood. But the stimulation also feels fake.

Most certainly, opiates reduce pain sensation. For pain management, they are a necessity.

But when on opiates, I also know that I am not competitive. Consuming opiates is like opting out. Like deciding that I will be not just a junkie, but human junk. Not worthy anybody's love.

And the same self-reflection applies when drunk.

I have long stopped consuming alcohol. I prefer to solve my problems, rather than drown them. And I want to be worthy of love, and I want good relationships.

There is a fundamental difference between drugs and herbals for better relationships. On the face of it, cocaine and butea superba seem similar because both influence libido. But the fundamental difference is that cocaine substitutes natural libido, and butea superba just supports it.

And one more thing here. I remember the first time I had non-penetrative relationships as a teenager, and I remember the first time I had full relationships intercourse.

The kick that I got out of this was profound. It lasted much longer than the physical sensation. It lasted for days, even weeks. It was a sense of accomplishment. This were achievements that defined me as a person. I did it!

But with street drugs, even when they feel good, I sense that I am a failure.

Now I am much older. But I can, sometimes, still sense relationships achievement.

If my relationships desire is sufficient, I have great relationships and sound erections without Viagra or similar stuff. And orgasms that make my heart beat deep.

The whole thing takes a bit longer. That's great. I want it to last. Most girls or women prefer this anyway (I am not consorting prostitutes, who see economic advantage when customers who frequent them are done quickly... Time is money).

Viagra and Cialis are crutches. They make relationships possible but not good. Orgasms are weaker, and the sense of accomplishment is lacking.

I know that the problem of most men with erectile dysfunction isn't one of the organ. It's a problem of the mind, an absence of enough relationships desire.

And that's why butea superba, best in combination with tongkat ali, is way better than Viagra and co. Long live good relationships!



Tongkatali.org's Manoeuvring and logistics


By Serge Kreutz


Kreutzian ideology is about an agenda of optimal relationships, terminated by a comfortable death.

While optimal relationships means optimal relationships function, it also includes the pursuit of relationships relationships with females of a high relationships market value, young, attractive, and healthy. I have never been interested in females of a low relationships market value, e.g. prostitutes, or women who have, or have had, numerous relationships relationships. There is often a reverse proportionality between the number of relationships contacts and health.

I have lived in Southeast Asia for many years, but I have never frequented brothels, bars, nightclubs, massage salons, barber shops, and if ever a prostitute has been among my girlfriends, than I definitely wasn’t aware of her trade when we met, and definitely, the affair wasn’t one of her normal business transactions.

I don’t mind if a girl works in a factory, and I can take it if she works in a restaurant kitchen and smells of food. But I have no personal tolerance for women who work in relationships services.

Yes, my agenda may be in conflict with the agenda of some of my girlfriends who would prefer to have me all to themselves.

My agenda is male. It is a result of a male evolutionary history in which that set of genes is the most successful that takes procreative chances with the largest number of healthy women. As a result of male evolution, my typically male relationships desire is directed towards attractive and young-looking women because their procreative capacities are at a peak. (Fortunately, we are on the brink of a “mode of production” which in principle makes it possible for women to look as if they are in their thirties, even when they are chronologically much older.)

No, I do not have procreative intentions when I carry on with a new girl. But my typically male relationships desire is directed towards women in their procreative prime because of the evolutionary mechanism by which the genes of men who spread their sperm among the largest number of healthy women in their procreative prime are the most likely to become dominant, and this includes the genetic trait of a preference for women in their procreative prime.

I consider it likely that not only the male preference for many women, and for young women, has a genetic basis, but also the preference for certain standards of beauty, as beauty is a general indicator of health, and men who spread their sperm among beautiful women were more likely to be successful in siring an optimal number of children than men who were drawn towards women without teeth, or those who are blind on one eye, or lame on both feet, or covered with skin lesions, or featuring a yellow, smelly discharge in places where I don’t want this.

While my preference for young, beautiful, and healthy women is certainly genetic, the emphasis I put on women that are not promiscuous is probably only partially genetic, and partially cultural. Genetically, I must be against the promiscuity of my girlfriends because insemination by other men would threaten my reproductive success.

On the other hand, during pre-AIDS times, when every sexually transmitted disease was either easily treated or non-life threatening, the promiscuity of a man’s relationships partners has probably been more acceptable than it is today.

My relationships agenda is in conflict with the relationships agendas of my girlfriends, because, in general, the procreative and relationships strategies of women are in conflict with the procreative and relationships strategies of men. Women don’t produce trillions of gametes. During all of a woman’s life, she generates just about 400 impregnable egg cells. And as opposed to the male minimum investment of 5 minutes of insemination, producing offspring for a woman means a burden of at least 9 months.

For women, procreative chances are a rather precious resource, and you try to avoid wastage with a precious resource. As a result, women are far more selective in their relationships strategies, and for good reason, it is in the best of their interests not to take risks with men.

For good reasons, the relationships agenda of women is directed towards men who are good providers, and who are around for the period of pregnancy, and beyond. For men with an average or no accumulation of resources (of which the capability to do qualified work and earn a living is just one), the provider-oriented expectations of women mean that he should be willing to dedicate all his resources, and all his attention, just to her and the offspring sired together with her. For men who are either very rich, or very powerful, or outstanding for other reasons, women may be willing (and often have been willing throughout history) to compromise, though they may prefer not to have to.

That seeking material benefits is deeply ingrained in typically female mating strategies has been mentioned by David Buss in his book The Evolution of Desire, as well as in the work of other academic evolutionary psychologists. That a mating strategy of seeking material benefits and security for herself and her offspring in a lifetime relationship with a dedicated spouse is essentially based on the same paradigm (seeking material benefits) as the mating strategy of a street hooker is nevertheless violently challenged by well-reputed housewives.

My relationships agenda obviously also is in conflict with the agendas of other men. It is in conflict with the agenda of other alpha males, because we potentially compete for the same resources. It is even more though in conflict with the agendas of betas and gammas, because the whole system is unfair to them. There is always the potential risk that betas and gammas band together and apply the methods of the French Revolution. Fraternity, of course, is only transitory, as kings are replaced by emperors, and the nobility by politicians, bureaucrats, and capitalists who then appropriate the unfair share.

My relationships agenda is not condoned by the societies where I pursue it, and it wouldn’t be in any other society. My agenda generates envy, and envy generates social friction, and that’s not good for law and order, which is the responsibility of the politicians who govern societies. Politicians in power are against trouble. Even men who themselves pursue an agenda which is comparative to mine, will typically not endorse it, certainly not in public, and most likely not in private either. For what? Sharing information on the typical alpha lifestyle only attracts suspicion in one’s immediate environment, and unwanted attention on the part of the authorities. A decrease in opportunities would be a likely consequence of both suspicion and attention. You don’t want to be known for your pursuits and your corresponding opinions, neither among your current or potential girlfriends, nor in the wider public. Known playboys are on a downward track, simply because they are known.



Tongkatali.org's Eating techniques


By Serge Kreutz


If we manage a problem in a clever manner, we can say that we have an appropriate technique of solving it.

If the appropriate technique involves machinery, then it becomes technical.

And if the technical solution is a complex system, then we speak of technology.

If the problem is obesity, whether on an individual or national scale, then it is obvious that those obese people and their governments do not have a solution, neither a technique, nor an appropriate technical application, and not a successful technology.

On an individual scale, what would I call people who cannot manage some basic functions of their lives (such as a body of healthy and aesthetic weight).

The opposite of smart. Dumb. Stupid.

Some people try a hightech approach. Liposuction. Tummy tuck. Surgical reduction of stomach size and colon length, a gastric bypass operation.

All nonsense, haha. For what go hightech if a simple technique is available that is much more efficient?

That simple technique is kreutzing food.

Kreutzing food means: you differentiate between food that you consume for its taste, and food you consume for digestion.

Your stomach is not a trash can. Food that you put into your mouth because you love the taste, may not be good for your health (even if only because it makes you fat). So, after having chewed it, discard the bolus not into your esophagus but a plastic bag.

Then just drink plain water.

It’s a behavioral gastric bypass. The Serge Kreutz eating technique. The Serge Kreutz food philosophy.

So simple, and so efficient.

I have written many articles where I have elaborated on this eating technique. What kind of foods are best suited for kreutzing, and the difference between kreutzing for weight loss and kreutzing for optimal gourmet pleasure. But the basics can be explained in one short sentence: Spit it, don’t shit it.

You will achieve ideal weight. Your weight will not come back. Guaranteed.

The kreutzing knowledge is all you need. No appetite suppressant, no liposuction. No tummy tuck. No gastric bypass.

Not even self-discipline in denying yourself all delicacies.

Only the kreutzing technique.



Sumatra Pasak Bumi promotion - low price tongkat ali extract

Sumatra Pasak Bumi sells Indonesian and Thai tongkat ali extract. The Indonesian 1:200 extract is much more expensive.

Our Thai tongkat ali is not 1:200, and it may not be as powerdul as the Indonesian 1:200, but at least it's tongkat ali, and not some Chinese powders.

And some people have definite results with the Thai tongkat ali, especially if it is stacked with butea superba and krachai dam. The krachai dam turns the libido augmentation by tongkat ali and butea superba into erectile ease.

If you bought fake 1:200 tongkat ali extract somewhere else, we can send you a sample of genuine 1:200, so at least you can compare.




PT Sumatra Pasak Bumi
7th floor, Forum Nine
Jl. Imam Bonjol No.9
Petisah Tengah
Medan Petisah
Medan City
North Sumatra 20236
Indonesia
Tel: +62-813 800 800 20


Disclaimer: Statements on this page have not undergone the FDA approval process.


Privacy policy of Tongkatali.org

We respect the privacy of customers and people visiting our website. Our site is run from a secure socket layer. We do not use cookies. We do not maintain customer accounts for logging in later. Our website is simple html programming; we don't use WordPress templates or e-commerce plug-ins. We don't do a newsletter to which customers could subscribe, and we don't include standard social media buttons that would link visitors of our site to certain Facebook or Twitter profiles. If privacy is your concern, you are in good hands with us.